Skip to main content

Calvert Litho billheads

Thomas Calvert was born to well-to-do parents in Yorkshire England on February 10, 1828, and was educated at Scarborough grammar school. At the age of 19 he entered the employ of George Hudson, the railway king of London. After one year with Hudson he accepted a position at a bank. In 1849 he came to the U.S. locating in Philadelphia and worked for the Pennsylvania Central Railway Co. While working for the railway, he bought an interest in George Cook & Co., engravers and color printers. Due to health concerns, his physician recommended he move to Minnesota, selling his interest in the firm. At Minnesota, he worked in the lumber business from 1853 to 1858. In 1858, he lost nearly everything he had – chiefly lumber and logs. In 1859, his health having improved, he moved back east and settled in Buffalo where he worked for Sage & Co.

In the early 1860s, Calvert moved to Detroit Michigan and entered a partnership with John Gibson, a lithographer and they carried on business under the name John Gibson & Co. In 1864, Calvert purchased Gibson’s interest in the firm and operated under the name Calvert & Co. His business was successful and in 1867, he incorporated it as the Calvert Lithographing & Engraving Company, with himself, Claude B. Candler and Charles Calvert (Thomas’ son) as officers. The firm had a capital stock of $40,000.

In March 1897, the corporation expired and its property and assets were transferred to the Calvert Lithographing Company. The new firm maintained officers in San Francisco, Chicago and St. Louis, as well as its main office in Detroit. Calvert died on February 8, 1900. Candler became the firm’s president. Soon after Thomas’ death, his son Charles retired from the business and thus ended the family’s involvement in the company.

Under Candler, the firm flourished. In 1950, the firm was sold to a group of Chicago investors. In 1970, the firm was absorbed by a the Canadian printing company Lawson & Jones.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Australian Billheads

As promised from by last post, here are some examples of Australian billheads I found on the website Print and Printmaking Australia Asia Pacific . Based on the Australian print collection at the National Gallery of Australia there is free online access to over 22,000 images. The databases can be searched by artist, subject or print techniques such as etching, woodcut, wood-engraving, linocut, lithograph, screenprint, monotype and other print related processes such as posters and artists books. Index to online information on printmakers, print workshops, print publishers, print galleries and public and private collections.

CAPEWELL HORSE NAIL COMPANY

I regularly purchase goods and paper at a local online auction. In December, I noticed that a lot of random estate / household goods also had a small pile of what looked to be calendars. I won the lot and sure enough it included many advertising calendars. Many of those were for the Capewell Horse Nail Company of Hartford Connecticut. These calendars were damaged, but the color and graphics were still very bright. Last week, I happened on a lot of paper through ebay that included a billhead for the company. Attached are photos of all for your enjoyment.

Rubber Goods

The rubber industry in the United States can hardly be said to have had any real and tangible existence until the discovery of the process of vulcanization in 1844 by Charles Goodyear. The first rubber ever imported into this country was brought into Boston in the year 1800 and came in In that same year a patent was granted to one Jacob Hummel, of Philadelphia, for a gum-elastic varnish; of which, however, there seems to have been no further mention. Some ten years later, in 1823, a Boston sea-captain, coming from South American ports, brought with him a pair of gilded rubber shoes which excited the greatest interest. Two years later, 500 pairs of rubber shoes, made by the natives along the Amazon, were brought into Boston, this time without the fantastical refinement of gilding. They were exceedingly thick, clumsy, and unshapely shoes, and yet they sold readily, bringing from $3 to $5 per pair as they were found that they were a secure protection against dampness. This was the e...